Denis Rancourt Is Now On Substack
People you should subscribe to (and support if you have the means)
I was super chuffed to see Denis Rancourt recommend the Sane Francisco Substack last week, and I am honoured to return the favour, especially by pointing you to two great recent articles of his.
(If you don’t know who Denis is, you can read about him in his Wikipedia entry; the fact that they malign him so heavily tells you that he’s one of the good guys!)
Leaving behind the joke that is Wiki, Denis Rancourt is a Canadian researcher and scientist whose work I first encountered early in the Scamdemic.
His videos and articles made frequent appearances in The Navy Blue Venn Diagram, the (secret! private! hidden! closed!) FB group I created in April 2020, once I realized I was definitely not imagining things and that yes, there was something seriously amiss with the Brandemic™ narrative being sold to us. Us NBVD-ers loved Denis!
The 10 minute video linked to in the image below must have been the first one of his I watched, and in it he effortlessly rips into the lies of the Covid-19 PsyOp, concurring with the work of Dr John Ioannidis and Dr Sucharit Bhakdi (amongst other eminent scientists) and exposing conflicts of interest.
The first article delves into all-cause mortality and government coercion
Oh wow, a sentence of pure heresy for its title! How audacious (and how true).
As one commenter wrote:
This has to be one of the best analyses of the whole "COVID" kit and caboodle that I've read anywhere.
Enjoy, bookmark and share:
The second discusses the novel concept of reforming science publishing
The idea of reforming science publishing is something so obvious, I’m surprised I haven’t seen this idea… um, basically everywhere. I would have especially appreciated this list of rules being attached to every lamentable “fact-checking” notice on social media, every time we had our wrists slapped for sharing something that went against the official Jackanory story.
Science publishing has largely become what rightly can be called “science propaganda”, in the service of special elite interests. These special interests include large-scale financial predation, social engineering to secure elite-class interests, and geopolitical dominance.
The multi-decadal shift ― from post-World-War-II freedom to complete evisceration of the practice of science in the public interest ― and the new near-total absence of professional independence among salaried scientists are indicators of advanced totalitarianism in our so‑called democratic Western societies.
Here are some basic rules that I would impose by law on the science publishing industry, and on authors wishing to publish in so-called peer-reviewed science journals.
Excellent rules, go read 'em!
DR is prolific and diligent. You can find all the many papers he has written (here are the ones on Covid) and all of his many videos here.
Hey, thanks! [smile emoji thingy]
Brandemic! 👏🏼 lol. Precisely. Thanks for this!